Naturalist fallacy tis defined as the error of defining what is good in terms of what is observable. For example: What's typical is normal; what's normal is good. According to G. E. Moore, Naturalistic Fallacy, is any argument which attempts to define the good in any terms whatsoever, including naturalistic terms; for Moore, Good is simple and indefinable. Some philosophers, most notably defenders of naturalism, have argued that Moore and others are wrong and that such arguments are not necessarily fallacious.
List of books: Naturalist,fallacy

Related Articles

Alienist at■■
The term "Alienist" was heading for obsolescence until it was returned to a position of some prominence . . . Read More
Theory of Multiple Intelligences at■■
Theory of Multiple Intelligences: Theory of Multiple Intelligences refers to the cognitive theory developed . . . Read More
Persuasion at■■
Persuasion: Persuasion is defined as a  deliberate attempt to change attitudes or beliefs with information . . . Read More
Conversation Theory at■■
Conversation Theory: Conversation Theory refers to a learning theory developed by Gordon Pask originated . . . Read More
Francis Galton (1822-1911) at■■
- Francis Galton (1822-1911) : Francis Galton one of the great scientist who was keenly interested in . . . Read More
Morals at■■
Morals: Morals is defined as values that humans attribute to a system of beliefs that help the individual . . . Read More
Defining feature at■■
Defining feature: Defining feature is defined as a feature that is necessarily a part of an object or . . . Read More
Computer simulation at■■
Computer simulation: Computer simulation refer to attempts to develop computer systems capable of mimicking . . . Read More
Fallacy at■■
. . . Read More
Controlled observation at■■
Controlled observation: Controlled observation is defined as an observational method in which the clinician/therapist . . . Read More