Naturalist fallacy tis defined as the error of defining what is good in terms of what is observable. For example: What's typical is normal; what's normal is good. According to G. E. Moore, Naturalistic Fallacy, is any argument which attempts to define the good in any terms whatsoever, including naturalistic terms; for Moore, Good is simple and indefinable. Some philosophers, most notably defenders of naturalism, have argued that Moore and others are wrong and that such arguments are not necessarily fallacious.
Related Articles | |
| Expressive Language Disorder at psychology-glossary.com | ■■■ |
Expressive Language Disorder refers to individual’s problems in spoken communication, as measured by . . . Read More | |
| Idols of the marketplace at psychology-glossary.com | ■■■ |
Idols of the marketplace refers to Bacon's term for error that results when one accepts the traditional . . . Read More | |
| Ethology at psychology-glossary.com | ■■■ |
Ethology is defined as the study of the behavior of animals in their normal environmentthe study of naturally . . . Read More | |
| Dependence at psychology-glossary.com | ■■■ |
Dependence is defined as reliance upon drugs or other supports that does not necessarily imply the features . . . Read More | |
| Appearance/reality distinction at psychology-glossary.com | ■■■ |
Appearance/reality distinction refers to the ability to keep the true properties or characteristics of . . . Read More | |
| 2006 CAT 980H S/N JMS01250 at top500.de | ■■ |
2006 CAT 980H S/N JMS01250: 2006 Caterpillar 980H EROPS, GP bucket, 19k hours, good running workingunit$119,500.00 . . . Read More | |